🔗 Share this article

Just two days before the NYC race for mayor, political analyst Michael Lange issued a bold electoral prediction – going beyond who would win citywide, but precinct by precinct. The analyst, an expert in elections born and raised in New York City, has spent over a decade in left-leaning activism and has become a kind of well-known figure this year for his thorough analyses into city data and polling.

He published his highly detailed prediction map – accurately predicting that the progressive candidate would win although failed to predict Andrew Cuomo’s strong performance – on his Substack, his platform. Lange possesses a talent for clever terms. He highlighted, for instance, the split between the “commie corridor”, running from one neighborhood to another area to a third locale, where he forecasted (correctly) that Mamdani would triumph by huge margins, and the “capitalist corridor” on affluent parts of Manhattan. There, certain media outlets and Wall Street Journal outrank the mainstream paper” in readership and the majority of electors leaned toward Cuomo, who ran as a moderate alternative.

Election Night Trends and Surprises

How was your night?

I had to do that because they were adding around 200,000 ballots into the tally frequently! I was actually a little nervous at the beginning: Mamdani was ahead the early vote by 12 points, but there were two big batches of ballots that came in after that and the advantage dropped from 12 to 8%. It was concerning.

You know, there was a world in which yesterday went kind of poorly for him, in which the opponent was going to end up essentially doubling his votes from the Democratic primary. But Mamdani gained half a million supporters to his initial base, and that’s a huge reason why he won. He campaigned and greatly broadened his base from the primary.

Expanding Support

Where did Mamdani gain those extra votes from?

He assembled the alliance that progressives always wanted to build: it’s multiracial, youthful, it’s renters and it’s people facing cost pressures. He improved considerably with minority communities, working- and middle-class voters, relative to the primary. Additionally he boosted his core of left-leaning activists, youthful radicals, and immigrant groups. He couldn’t have won without making those significant inroads.

He created the alliance that the left always wanted to build: multiracial, youthful, tenants and residents struggling with costs

Additionally, there were a number of supporters of both candidates – is that a big trend?

It’s definitely a genuine phenomenon, limited to working-class Latinos, south Asians and Islamic voters. Electors in ethnic enclaves that supported Trump last year backed Zohran this year. However I wouldn’t say he was winning over Caucasian laborers and Maga voters.

Voter Participation and Effects

A major development of the night was the record turnout. Who did that help?

Each candidate. Participation was much greater than anticipated. I figured it could exceed two million, but it reached 2.3M – which is a huge number of participants. There was a substantial opposition group, energized, but the Mamdani base was also motivated, and that was enough to secure victory.

You forecasted he’d get over 50% of the vote. Is he likely for that?

Currently you would say he’s likely to get over half. He’s at just over 50% but remain probably 200K ballots left to report at that time. Thus I don’t think certain, but I think it’s likely, and I wish he does so then no one can say Sliwa was a spoiler.

Republican Collapse

Curtis Sliwa, the conservative contender, is the other big story. His support plummeted.

He didn’t win a single precinct in any borough. Including Tottenville in Staten Island, which is like an 88% Trump area. That truly surprised me. Cuomo kept very white areas, very wealthy areas and devout communities, and plus gained many conservatives on the island with a high participation. I believe there was significant tactical voting by the Republicans. They were doing it prior to the former president endorsed for Cuomo, but that definitely helped. It might have changed the outcome unless the winning alliance hadn’t grown.

The “Commie Corridor”

Regarding your much mentioned “commie corridor” – was support for the candidate dominant in those areas of the boroughs?

I think existed a little dilution of the progressive zone in certain places like neighborhoods that have more older white ethnic folks. There, for example, the Greek landlords and homeowners all went for Cuomo. Thus there was some opposition. However no, mostly the leftist base is a key factor why Zohran won – he was polling between 77% and 83% in specific neighborhoods.

Community Support

In the lead-up to the vote we reported on if Mamdani was making inroads with Jewish New Yorkers. Is there any suggestion that he did?

Exist areas with a lot of non-religious and left-inclined voters – like Park Slope and Morningside Heights – where he performed strongly. However in the affluent districts such as the Manhattan area, his Middle East stance was influential in those places. Likewise in the moderate communities like Forest Hills, Rego Park, or Spuyten Duyvil and Riverdale – they all leaned the independent. And also, there are newcomers from the former Soviet Union in southern Brooklyn, they were pretty staunchly supportive. So it’s unclear if there were crazy narrative-busters here, but he did hold more progressive Jewish neighborhoods and even parts of the another locale with large leads.

Political Impact

Has Mamdani rewritten what the city means politically? Will the commie corridor serve as a springboard for leftwing candidates?

Yes, it’s not accidental that key political leaders from progressives hail from a few areas in the boroughs. I believe that we’ll see more of that – candidates will emerge from these neighborhoods to be elevated nationally.

But I think that every city in the US can have their own commie corridor. Urban places are the centers of progressive influence in the nation – since they’re young, tenancy is common and they represent locales where individuals struggle by the inequalities we face.